Datacenter Hosting and Colocation Providers

Compare datacenter providers by country, footprint, service mix, and review signals. Verify power, SLA, remote hands, cross-connects, and terms.

0
plans
5
providers
2
types

Top providers

12 plans

Affiliate link: we may earn a commission if you buy after clicking. Rankings remain editorially independent. Disclosure

Plan Location SLA Traffic DDoS Monthly price Action

No results found

Loading...

How to use this comparison

Datacenter hosting is for buyers who need a provider’s physical footprint before they compare servers, cloud accounts, domains, or email. This page can only make a cautious shortlist today: the live datacenter screener has no loaded offers, so treat provider coverage as orientation, not availability proof.

Current Coverage

Do not buy colocation from a logo grid. Check these facts before a quote turns into a contract:

  • A listed country is not a rack address.
  • A public review score is not a datacenter SLA.
  • A cloud footprint does not prove remote hands, cross-connects, or included traffic.
  • A low monthly server price says nothing about power, egress, cancellation, or migration cost.

Hetzner is the cleanest infrastructure example in the current coverage. Hetzner was founded in 1997 in Germany. Hetzner has listed locations in Germany, Finland, the United States, and Singapore. Hetzner covers servers and cloud services.

Infomaniak was founded in 1994 in Switzerland. Infomaniak has listed locations in Geneva and Zurich. Infomaniak covers datacenter, cloud, GPU, domains, CDN, and email services.

Hostinger was founded in 2004 in Lithuania. Hostinger has listed locations across the United States, France, Germany, Lithuania, the United Kingdom, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brazil, South Africa, and Australia. Hostinger covers servers, cloud, domains, CDN, and email services.

Review Signals

Infomaniak has a Trustpilot rating of 4.0 from 1,933 reviews as of 2026-07-04. Infomaniak has a G2 rating of 1.8 from 2 reviews. Infomaniak has a HostAdvice rating of 4.0 from 43 reviews.

Hostinger has a Trustpilot rating of 4.7 from 69,842 reviews as of 2026-07-04. Hostinger has a G2 rating of 4.4 from 821 reviews. Hostinger has a HostAdvice rating of 5.0 from 2,466 reviews.

Review averages need context. A broad hosting review can tell you something about support and billing friction, but it does not prove rack quality, network engineering, or incident response inside a facility.

How to Shortlist

Start with geography. US and UK buyers should separate latency needs from compliance needs before comparing brands. A rack in the wrong region is not fixed by a polished control panel.

Use Hetzner as the active infrastructure candidate in this coverage when server and cloud footprint matter across Europe, the United States, and Singapore. Keep Infomaniak on the research list when Swiss locations and datacenter scope matter. Keep Hostinger on the research list when broad global locations matter, but verify datacenter availability before treating it as a colocation option.

Before buying, ask for written terms on power, SLA credits, remote hands, cross-connects, traffic billing, support escalation, backups, and cancellation. If those terms are missing, do not infer them from brand reputation, affiliate placement, or a review average.